Raj Kapoor sang in Mera Naam Joker:
"ai bhaai !! zara dekh ke chalo---"
and since morning I was looking at this chart and wondering:
"while my Count is suggesting that (since)(iii)=5310-5180=130 is not an extended wave vis-a-vis (i)=5342-5246=96 and (hence) (v) should be extended----
but these Hourly TA indicators are already oversold and showing the positioning similar to an extended 3rd where Indicaters go into oversold zone and then show negative divergence as 5th goes below extended 3rd."
Same was happening here---though (v)=5236-5161 was going below (iii) but Indicaters were showing negative divergence(see chart for clarity) and my mind stuck in extended 5th was thinking 5080."
IT WAS NOT MATCHING.
And then came the Eureka moment---
(iii)=5310-5180=130 was indeed extended but not vis-a-vis (i) but vis-a-vis (v).
AND EVERYTHING GOT MATCHED.
Now lets come to our EW labels:
.png)
.png)
.png)
Thus I would prefer counting Y.b from 5161.25 upwards:
.png)
Piyush asked:
"guruji in 1>3>5 diagonal if 3 is .62 of 1 then 5 wud probably
be .38?? hope i am not bothering u with so many q?"
.png)
.png)
"ai bhaai !! zara dekh ke chalo---"
and since morning I was looking at this chart and wondering:
"while my Count is suggesting that (since)(iii)=5310-5180=130 is not an extended wave vis-a-vis (i)=5342-5246=96 and (hence) (v) should be extended----
but these Hourly TA indicators are already oversold and showing the positioning similar to an extended 3rd where Indicaters go into oversold zone and then show negative divergence as 5th goes below extended 3rd."
Same was happening here---though (v)=5236-5161 was going below (iii) but Indicaters were showing negative divergence(see chart for clarity) and my mind stuck in extended 5th was thinking 5080."
IT WAS NOT MATCHING.
And then came the Eureka moment---
(iii)=5310-5180=130 was indeed extended but not vis-a-vis (i) but vis-a-vis (v).
AND EVERYTHING GOT MATCHED.
Now lets come to our EW labels:
.png)
.png)
.png)
Thus I would prefer counting Y.b from 5161.25 upwards:
.png)
Piyush asked:
"guruji in 1>3>5 diagonal if 3 is .62 of 1 then 5 wud probably
be .38?? hope i am not bothering u with so many q?"
First of all, dear Piyush, I consider it my privilege whenever anyone asks a question. so this latter part should not bother you.
I have not yet been able to establish any "reportable" proportion in various arms of a diagonal be it sw1>sw3>sw5 or sw1<sw3<sw5 .
Sandy asked about fractals of (iv) of Y.a=5180-5336=56
It was a Double zig-zag;yesterday I had posted:
.png)
There was a small change in labels of last abc
.png)
Thanks for asking--- it helps me grow.
Raghu
Sir thanx for helping all of us with your EW count.
ReplyDeletenow I am little bit confused about wxyxz.
From
1. 5629- 5171 wave A (W).
2. 5171-5499 wave B (X).
3. 5499-5136 wave C (y).
4. 5136-5378 wave (X).
5. 5378-5161 wave (Z).
But sir I don’t know I m right or wrong.
W=abc=5629-5136
Deletex=abc=5136-5378(ending at 5342)in following manner:
a=5136-5378
b=5378-5184(ending at 5190,last subwave being truncated)
c=5190-5342
Y=5342 downwards again as abc of which
a=5342-5161 got completed today
b=5161 upwards-started today
I have written it many times during past few days---once again repeating. Next time if anyone again asks--I will tell him to contact you
:-D
ok sir now i got it.
DeleteThankyou so much.