http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/9467/nifty31020111.jpg
and subwaves of W4.C are as follows:
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/7201/nifty31020112.jpg
And as W5 has begun from 5026 for a tentative length of 615(=W1) in 5 waves,
I would count it as:
SW1=5026-4824=202
SW2 in progress--- Target 1=4890
http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/8192/nifty301020113.jpg
All longs now should have a SL at 4824.
Raghu
dear guruji,
ReplyDeleteafter u had put the query on truncation, i was
Have a very basic doubt that comes from this observation below:-
a: 4720 5169 449
b: 5169 4759 -410 -91.3%
c: 4759 5024 265 59.0% (less than 61.8%)
Does a C wave TRUNCATION imply failure of c to do MIN 0.618 x a ??
or, is it that only in this case, as a one-off event,
we have c.5 failing to go over C.3 & at the same time, C has not done Min 0.618xa ??
Pls advise.
urs
Dear Shri,
ReplyDeleteMay be you did not go through the full post.
C wave' 3rd subwave ended at 5034 and 5th at 5026 (thereby making the 5th of C truncated).
C,therefore went 4759-5034 =274 making it 61%